> The patch is OK. Thanks, the patch was committed. > > That's a good point. I added a check for this case - so if CONST_INT is > > passed > > we assume that mode is QI. But usually promoted value resides in a > > register, so > > we don't go over-conservative here. > Hmm, so if we use broadcast constant, then we won't end up having CONST_INT > here? > It is OK then. Currently we don't end up with CONST_INT. But maybe we'd need to revisit this place later.
Michael > Honza
