> > The patch is OK. > Thanks, the patch was committed. > > > > That's a good point. I added a check for this case - so if CONST_INT is > > > passed > > > we assume that mode is QI. But usually promoted value resides in a > > > register, so > > > we don't go over-conservative here. > > Hmm, so if we use broadcast constant, then we won't end up having CONST_INT > > here? > > It is OK then. > Currently we don't end up with CONST_INT. But maybe we'd need to revisit this > place later.
OK, I merged in my misaligned prologues changes and will post patch after full testing. It seemed to go seamlessly. I spotted there are still few places for cleanup, so i will try to handle there incrementally. Do you have plans on enabling the SSE memcpy/memset on Atom now? What about the move_by_pieces/set_by_pieces via SSE now? Thanks! Honza > > Michael > > Honza
