On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 12:59:49PM +0100, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> I see another "read_line" at gcov.c, which seems to be a copy.
Copy of what? gcov.c read_line hardly can be allowed to fail because out of
mem unlike this one for caret diagnostics.
Though, surely, this one could be somewhat adjusted so that it really
doesn't use a temporary buffer but reads directly into the initially
malloced, then realloced, buffer. But, if we want it to eventually switch
to caching the caret diagnostics, it won't be possible/desirable anymore.
Jakub
