Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net> writes: > On May 7, 2014, at 2:26 AM, Richard Sandiford > <rdsandif...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> The DImode constant spliiter assigned the result of trunc_int_for_mode >> to an unsigned int rather than a HOST_WIDE_INT. This then produced >> const_ints >> that were zero-extended rather than sign-extended and tripped the assert: >> >> gcc_checking_assert (INTVAL (x.first) >> == sext_hwi (INTVAL (x.first), precision) >> || (x.second == BImode && INTVAL (x.first) == 1)); >> >> The other hunks are just by inspection, but I think gen_int_mode is >> preferred over GEN_INT when the mode is obvious. >> >> Tested by Rainer, who says that the boostrap now completes. >> OK to install? > > Ok.
I think this needs a backend maintainer. Although it was exposed by the wide-int assert, it isn't really wide-int-related as such. Thanks, Richard
