On Aug 11, 2014, at 10:57 AM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> + if (timeout != -1)
>> + {
>> + signal (SIGALRM, alarm_handler);
>> + alarm (timeout);
>> + }
>
> Not sure how much portable signal/alarm is. So probably should be guarded
> by the existence of signal.h, SIGALRM being defined etc.Generally speaking, newlib doesn’t have it (and I use newlib to build gcc for testing). Autoconf and HAVE_alarm is better, newlib has a SIGALRM.
