On Feb 27, 2005, at 3:59 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote:
In stark contrast, i believe it is a very good idea for us to be "over organized" about this. As for judging importance, the release manager has always judged what is important for a given release, based on general goals.
I agree. IMO taking one more step in the same direction is also a good idea. And next step would be: _any_ big patch needs proposal on public list in advance at any stage of release cycle.
- Devang
