Daniel Berlin wrote:
Your transform is correct. The FE is not. The variable is not read only. It is write once, then read-only.
Diego, your analysis is exactly correct about what is happenning.
I agree, in principle. The C++ FE should not set TREE_READONLY on variables that require dynanmic initialization. Until now, that's not been a problem, and it does result in better code. But, it's now becoming a problem, and we have others way to get good code coming down the pipe.
I do think the C++ FE needs fixing before Diego's change gets merged, though. I can make the change, but not instantly. If someone files a PR, and assigns to me, I'll get to it at some not-too-distant point.
-- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] (916) 791-8304
