On Apr 4, 2005, Richard Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 07:57:09PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >> My head hurts about the GGC implications of opaque pointers in such a >> hash table, and retaining pointers in the hash table that have already >> been otherwise freed.
> These are solved problems. Only in the mathematical sense. We still have such incorrect uses in our tree, as the bootstrap problem I reported shows. -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED], gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist [EMAIL PROTECTED], gnu.org}
