Does this bug look familiar? 20629 is ICEing in the same spot, but it looks like theirs was reproducible after preprocessing. Is there any more information that I provide that would be helpful? I've attached the command line, specs and a stacktrace from cc1plus.
I think this was fixed on the mainline by: 2005-03-18 Dale Johannese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* cp/tree.c (cp_tree_equal): Handle SSA_NAME.
Yep, and I didn't put it in the release branch. Bad Dale. OK to do that?
If this is the same problem, changing the VN hashtable size to 1 should make it show up reproducibly.
