"D. Hugh Redelmeier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
| | At this point we need: | | (1) agreement from C and C++ maintainers on access through volatile | | lvalue | | I don't know C++ well enough to say whether the analogous optimization | is wrong for C++. C++ has resisted, for two decades, the temptation of "improving" the meaning of volatile :-) considering that it is C's baby. [ the only area where there is a difference betwenn C and C++ is things like x = y = z; but that wasn't desined specifically to "improve" over C's semantics of volatile. ] -- Gaby
