On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 09:33:19AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>Can someone with approval privilege over the build system look at this, 
>>and OK it? (it's a very simple patch)
>
>I must apologize for the delay in handling this.  This alternative patch 
>avoids that mingw is hardcoded in the makefiles.  FWIW, it is also even 
>smaller,
>
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
>vs.
>
> 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
>:ADDPATCH build:
>
>I have only tested it on Linux, can you give it a try?  Ok if FX's 
>testing succeeds?
>
>2005-08-09  Paolo Bonzini  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>       * config.build (build_have_sh_scripts): Default to yes,
>       set to no for mingw32.
>       * configure.ac (build_have_sh_scripts): AC_SUBST it.
>       * Makefile.in (stamp-as, stamp-collect-ld, stamp-nm): If
>       build_have_sh_scripts is false, rely on $(LN).
>       * configure: Regenerate.

This would conflict with my proposed changes to pex-win32.c .  It seems
like getting '#!' functioning on mingw would be a better solution than
relying on $(LN) on mingw.

I haven't gotten around to implementing this in libiberty because I've
been on vacation but I should have time to do this this week, if it is
still desirable.

cgf

Reply via email to