On 13.05.23 02:45, Po Lu via Gcc wrote:
Gabriel Ravier <gabrav...@gmail.com> writes:
...You're joking, right ? You can't possibly be seriously arguing
this, you have to be kidding... right ?
No, I'm not. The meaning of a variable declaration with only a storage
class specifier is extremely clear: the type of the variable is `int'.
C99, 6.7.2, "Type specifiers"
# Constraints
# At least one type specifier shall be given in the declaration
# specifiers in each declaration, and in the specifier-qualifier
# list in each struct declaration and type name.
There's absolutely nothing ambiguous about it whatsoever:
In C99 and onwards, this is an error (a violation of a "shall"
directive).
register i;
extern limit, *k, do_some_computation ();
for (i = 0; i < limit; ++i)
k[i] = do_some_computation (i);
Please try to prove me wrong.
Happy to oblige.
