gcc  

Messages by Thread

• Constant Pool Anchors Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
• gcc-16-20260322 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• GSoC 2026 Proposal: Improving OOB detection for FAMs in -fanalyzer Virginia Hany via Gcc
• Contribution to Static Analyzer: Looking for "Good First Issues" (known_functions) Virginia Hany via Gcc
• gcc-15-20260321 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-14-20260320 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• [GSOC 2026] Implementation of kf_strnlen and follow-up on Testsuite Saish Kambali via Gcc
• libiberty: potential bugs in mkstemps Tomás Ortín Fernández via Gcc
• Sourceware Survey 2026 Mark Wielaard
• Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Claudio Bantaloukas via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Christophe Lyon via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Claudio Bantaloukas via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Pietro Monteiro via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Claudio Bantaloukas via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Rainer Orth via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Paul Koning via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Earliest version of gcc the project should support as stage1 for gcc 17? Paul Koning via Gcc
• Request for COURSERA ACCOUNT Sak via Gcc
  • Re: Request for COURSERA ACCOUNT Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Robert Dubner
  • Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Richard Biener via Gcc
  • RE: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Robert Dubner
  • Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. David Malcolm via Gcc
  • RE: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Robert Dubner
  • Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. James K. Lowden
  • Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Richard Biener via Gcc
  • RE: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Robert Dubner
  • Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Richard Biener via Gcc
  • RE: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Robert Dubner
  • Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Richard Biener via Gcc
  • RE: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Robert Dubner
  • Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Richard Biener via Gcc
  • RE: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Robert Dubner
  • Re: COBOL: Hoping for insight with middle-end computation time. Richard Biener via Gcc
• gcc-13-20260319 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• cannot report bug: -Wuninitialized not detected when certain function call exists m2rad0--- via Gcc
  • Re: cannot report bug: -Wuninitialized not detected when certain function call exists Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• [GSOC 2026] Developed the testsuite for strnlen() and the procedure to implement kf_strnlen() Saish Kambali via Gcc
• Re: Experiment-0: Submission of Final Report(Scheduler) Himadri Chhaya-Shailesh via Gcc
• [GSoC][RFC] Extending C++ support in -fanalyzer Egas Ribeiro via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC][RFC] Extending C++ support in -fanalyzer David Malcolm via Gcc
• Proposed GSoC project to add Data Race Detection to GCC GNAT Ada front end Tucker Taft via Gcc
• Request for GSoC Proposal Feedback Stefan Weigl-Bosker via Gcc
• Google disabled my account Tomás Ortín Fernández via Gcc
  • Re: Google disabled my account David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: Google disabled my account Tomás Ortín Fernández via Gcc
  • Re: Google disabled my account Martin Jambor
  • Re: Google disabled my account Tomás Ortín Fernández via Gcc
• Re: GSoC 2026: Experiment-0 Complete (All 4 Phases) Himadri Chhaya-Shailesh via Gcc
• [GSOC 2026] Completed the Newbies guide & proposal for strnlen implementation Saish Kambali via Gcc
  • Re: [GSOC 2026] Completed the Newbies guide & proposal for strnlen implementation David Malcolm via Gcc
• [GSoC PATCH] libiberty: use heap-backed parse state in d_demangle Jialong Wang via Gcc
• [PATCH] libiberty: use heap-backed parse state in d_demangle Jialong Wang via Gcc
• RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Michael Matz via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Michael Matz via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Michael Matz via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Michael Clark via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Michael Clark via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Michael Matz via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Andrew Stubbs
  • Re: RFC: Allow "(mem:<vectype> (reg:<vectype>))" Michael Matz via Gcc
• [GSoC PATCH] libiberty: Add demangler recursion limit test Jialong Wang via Gcc
• [GSoC] Interested in the cp-demangle non-recursive project Jialong Wang via Gcc
  • [GSoC] Interested in the cp-demangle non-recursive project jerrywang183--- via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Interested in the cp-demangle non-recursive project Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Interested in the cp-demangle non-recursive project jerrywang183--- via Gcc
• Curious about GCC language support Terry Bennett via Gcc
  • Re: Curious about GCC language support Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• Re: Draft GSoC 2026 Proposal: CPython API Checking, PR 107646 David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: Draft GSoC 2026 Proposal: CPython API Checking, PR 107646 David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: Draft GSoC 2026 Proposal: CPython API Checking, PR 107646 Saksham Gupta via Gcc
  • Re: Draft GSoC 2026 Proposal: CPython API Checking, PR 107646 David Malcolm via Gcc
• gcc-16-20260315 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-15-20260314 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Jerry D via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Jeffrey Law via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Paul Koning via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Policy on use of LLM tools and bug fixes Mark Wielaard
• [GSOC 2026] Extending GCC Static Analyzer and POSIX API checking Saish Kambali via Gcc
• gcc-14-20260313 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• [GSoC 2026] Exploring GCC Static Analyzer and POSIX API checking Saish Kambali via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC 2026] Exploring GCC Static Analyzer and POSIX API checking David Malcolm via Gcc
• Sourceware Open Office, Fri 16:00 UTC Mark Wielaard
  • Re: Sourceware Open Office, Fri 16:00 UTC Mark Wielaard
• gcc-13-20260312 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Questions on PROMOTE_MODE, function_promote_mode Vineet Gupta via Gcc
  • Re: Questions on PROMOTE_MODE, function_promote_mode H.J. Lu via Gcc
  • Re: Questions on PROMOTE_MODE, function_promote_mode Vineet Gupta via Gcc
  • Re: Questions on PROMOTE_MODE, function_promote_mode H.J. Lu via Gcc
  • Re: Questions on PROMOTE_MODE, function_promote_mode Vineet Gupta via Gcc
  • Re: Questions on PROMOTE_MODE, function_promote_mode H.J. Lu via Gcc
  • Re: Questions on PROMOTE_MODE, function_promote_mode Vineet Gupta via Gcc
  • Re: Questions on PROMOTE_MODE, function_promote_mode H.J. Lu via Gcc
  • Re: Questions on PROMOTE_MODE, function_promote_mode Vineet Gupta via Gcc
  • Re: Questions on PROMOTE_MODE, function_promote_mode Jeffrey Law via Gcc
• Re: Submission of Experiment-0 Report – VM Oversubscription & Tracing Himadri Chhaya-Shailesh via Gcc
• Re: [GSoC2026][Experiment-0] Part1~2 Writeup Himadri Chhaya-Shailesh via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC2026][Experiment-0] Part1~2 Writeup Yuao Ma via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC2026][Experiment-0] Part1~2 Writeup Himadri Chhaya-Shailesh via Gcc
• GSoC 2026: Static Analyzer and format-string shulin gonsalves via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC 2026: Static Analyzer and format-string David Malcolm via Gcc
• Requesting guidance on GSoC 2026 Arnav Soni via Gcc
  • Re: Requesting guidance on GSoC 2026 Martin Jambor
• [GSoC] Improving gcc for Windows targets Julian Waters via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Improving gcc for Windows targets Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Improving gcc for Windows targets Julian Waters via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Improving gcc for Windows targets Martin Jambor
  • Re: [GSoC] Improving gcc for Windows targets Joseph Tay via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Improving gcc for Windows targets Joseph Tay via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Improving gcc for Windows targets Martin Jambor
  • Re: [GSoC] Improving gcc for Windows targets Joseph Tay via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Improving gcc for Windows targets Martin Jambor
  • Re: [GSoC] Improving gcc for Windows targets Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Improving gcc for Windows targets LIU Hao via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Improving gcc for Windows targets Julian Waters via Gcc
• GSoC 2026 - Project Selection Guidance CHIKI Badreddine via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC 2026 - Project Selection Guidance Martin Jambor
• GCC 16.0.1 Status Report (2026-03-09) Richard Biener via Gcc
• gcc-16-20260308 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• [GSoC] Enhance OpenACC support questions Sebastian Galindo via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Enhance OpenACC support questions Tobias Burnus
  • Re: [GSoC] Enhance OpenACC support questions Sebastian Galindo via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Enhance OpenACC support questions Sebastian Galindo via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Enhance OpenACC support questions Sebastian Galindo via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Enhance OpenACC support questions Tobias Burnus
  • Re: [GSoC] Enhance OpenACC support questions Sebastian Galindo via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Enhance OpenACC support questions Thomas Schwinge
• gcc-15-20260307 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-14-20260306 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• [GSoC] Interest in extending the static analyzer Egas Ribeiro via Gcc
  • Re: [GSoC] Interest in extending the static analyzer David Malcolm via Gcc
• GSoC 2026: Extending -fanalyzer for CPython API Checking (Bug 107646) Saksham Gupta via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC 2026: Extending -fanalyzer for CPython API Checking (Bug 107646) Saksham Gupta via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC 2026: Extending -fanalyzer for CPython API Checking (Bug 107646) David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC 2026: Extending -fanalyzer for CPython API Checking (Bug 107646) Saksham Gupta via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC 2026: Extending -fanalyzer for CPython API Checking (Bug 107646) David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC 2026: Extending -fanalyzer for CPython API Checking (Bug 107646) Saksham Gupta via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC 2026: Extending -fanalyzer for CPython API Checking (Bug 107646) David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC 2026: Extending -fanalyzer for CPython API Checking (Bug 107646) Saksham Gupta via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC 2026: Extending -fanalyzer for CPython API Checking (Bug 107646) David Malcolm via Gcc
• Smart phone Fundi Zombie via Gcc
• gcc-13-20260305 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• GSoC: Interest in libgomp Scheduler Guided OpenMP Project vatsal darji via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC: Interest in libgomp Scheduler Guided OpenMP Project Himadri Chhaya-Shailesh via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC: Interest in libgomp Scheduler Guided OpenMP Project Himadri Chhaya-Shailesh via Gcc
• Progress Update on Experiment-0 Roy Fru via Gcc
  • Re: Progress Update on Experiment-0 Himadri Chhaya-Shailesh via Gcc
• GSoC OpenMP Questions Stefan Weigl-Bosker via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC OpenMP Questions Tobias Burnus
• GSoC - Interested in GCC Compiler Work CHIKI Badreddine via Gcc
  • Re: GSoC - Interested in GCC Compiler Work David Malcolm via Gcc
• Re: SFrame for C++ coroutine stack traces Indu Bhagat via Gcc
  • Re: SFrame for C++ coroutine stack traces Mehrdad Niknami via Gcc
• ᴀᴄᴄᴏᴜɴᴛ ʟɪᴍɪᴛᴇᴅ ɴᴇᴛꜰʟɪx via Gcc
• gcc-16-20260301 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Prospective GSoC 2026 Contributor – Interested in Contributing to Extend the static analysis pass Virginia Hany via Gcc
  • Re: Prospective GSoC 2026 Contributor – Interested in Contributing to Extend the static analysis pass Martin Jambor
• gcc-15-20260228 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-14-20260227 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-13-20260226 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• GNAT Feature Proposal: Protected Subprogram Atomic Trampolines Liam Powell via Gcc
  • Re: GNAT Feature Proposal: Protected Subprogram Atomic Trampolines Eric Botcazou via Gcc
  • Re: GNAT Feature Proposal: Protected Subprogram Atomic Trampolines Liam Powell via Gcc
• Gcc - ITB Berlin 2026 Arabella Skinner via Gcc
  • Gcc - ITB Berlin 2026 Trinity Archer via Gcc
  • Gcc - ITB Berlin 2026 Kade Carver via Gcc
• Starting patch review wiki Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc
  • Re: Starting patch review wiki David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: Starting patch review wiki Richard Biener via Gcc

• Earlier messages