On Thu, 2 Nov 2023, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:

> Note the semantic of __builtin_clz is _not_ altered by
> CLZ_DEFINED_VALUE_AT_ZERO, the behavior
> of __builtin_clz (x) is that is has undefined result for x == 0.

Note also the discussion in bug 111309 of possible future type-generic 
versions of operations such as clz (under a different name because 
__builtin_clz is already taken), in order to support _BitInt, where 
there's a plausible argument for defining the result for all argument 
values rather than leaving it undefined at 0.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com

Reply via email to