On 3/8/24 5:28 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 22:35, Frank Scheiner via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >> >> On 08.03.24 23:00, Peter Bergner wrote: >>> On 3/8/24 7:16 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote: >>>> I CCed Jeff who is on the commitee to forward the maintainer proposal >>>> though I guess this will not go forward as a first step. Instead >>>> you are probably expected to show activity on the port, for example >>>> post the patch series to make ia64 use LRA, get write access to the >>>> git repository and then be promoted maintainer. >>> >>> One other method for showing activity is posting regular testsuite >>> results on the gcc-testresults mailing list to show the community >>> the port is "working". >> >> I don't want to spam this or the other list each and every week, but I > > Sending test results to the gcc-testresults list is **not** spamming, > that's what the list is for!
100% agree! If you look at what we (IBM) post, we roughly post somewhere around 7 testsuite results per day due to runs on different hardware, endianness and OS (Linux versus AIX). So spam ...err... post away! > If you're testing uncommon targets (e.g. ia64-linux) then sending test > results to the list is essential so we know the target builds, because > nobody else is testing it. Again, 100% agree! Peter
