On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 9:59 AM Thor Preimesberger <tcpreimesber...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sure - we actually already emit json in optinfo-emit-json.cc, and there are > implementations of json and pretty-printing/dumping it out also. I got a > hacky version of our current raw dump working with json objects, but using > the functions and data structures in tree-dump.* "as is" would require > further processing of the dump's output (and I think some further > modification) in order to make linking related nodes possible - I think, at > least. This seems expensive computationally, so I'm currently re-implementing > the function dump_generic_nodes from tree-pretty-print.cc so that it emits > JSON instead. tree-dump.cc doesn't currently handle all the current tree > codes in dequeue_and_dump. This approach does unfortunately lead us to having > another spot in the code base that needs to be synced with the tree data > structure. (I didn't take a long look at tree-streamer* to see if anything > there would be helpful, but it looks like we'd have to enumerate over the > codes anyways to get JSON output.) > > No patch yet - I'll submit one once the JSON dumping is ready, and others > that process it as appropriate. I've been pushing to get as much done before > Wednesday, so I'll have to get around to pushing onto the git fork what I've > done so far tomorrow / later today.
I'd like to actually see some of the progress here, even if incomplete; even if there's two versions (Tree-dump and dump_generic_nodes). > I wanna emphasize that I started a bit late on this since my academic term > didn't end until around a month after the coding period began. We've already > extended the project to accommodate for that, but it places the mid point > review to three weeks in a project that is expected to take 12 weeks. We can > still address the rate of progress if you still feel trepidacious about the > pace of things. There are 8 weeks left until final code submission, so we're 1/3rd into the project. That would be 4 weeks, but I understand that it's more like three on your side. At this point there should be a clear path forward, thus the design should be set. It's a bit unfortunate that there's nothing written down in code or e-mail from your side that shows progress there - I hope we can sort this out later today. Richard. > > Thor > > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 3:26 AM Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > we're having our bi-weekly call this Wednesday; I'd like to see you write a > > summary of what you were doing for the first half of the project and post > > that to me and the GCC mailing list. Please also send, if appropriate, a > > patch that shows what you have done sofar. > > > > Thanks a lot, > > Richard.
