On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Alejandro Colomar via Gcc wrote: > > See reflector message SC22WG14.18575, 17 Nov 2020 (the former convenor > > replying when I asked about just that paper). > > Where can I find reflector messages?
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/18575 > And another one to propose that [n] means the same as [static n] except > for the nonnull property of static. I'm not convinced that introducing extra undefined behavior for things that have been valid since C89 (which would be the effect of such a change for any code that passes a smaller array) is a good idea - the general mood is to *reduce* undefined behavior. -- Joseph S. Myers josmy...@redhat.com
