FX Coudert <fxcoud...@gmail.com> writes: >> Ah yes indeed it is systematic. Many thanks for spotting this - git >> pushed GNU flex required >> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-cvs/2024-July/406305.html > > Couldn’t the generated files be committed to the tree, so that flex is not > needed (unless one modifies the source). This is what is done for the other > use of flex. > > FX
Thanks for the hint, yes opened PR 116123 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116123 regards, Gaius
