On Fri, 27 Sept 2024 at 09:13, Dennis Luehring <dl.so...@gmx.net> wrote: > > Am 27.09.2024 um 09:56 schrieb Jonathan Wakely: > > On Fri, 27 Sept 2024, 08:39 Dennis Luehring, <dl.so...@gmx.net> wrote: > > > > > Am 27.09.2024 um 09:34 schrieb Jonathan Wakely: > > > > > > > > > > They might not have > > > > been using the original gcc-3.4.0 sources. > > > > > > > > > seems to be very possible > > > > > > > > > > > > > There should be no need to edit those files, but that doesn't mean that > > > the > > > > people who built your old toolchain didn't edit them. > > > > > > the other way would be using --with-multilib-list=list ? > > > but that usage should be visible by using -v on the original build, or? > > > > > > > I think so yes, but I'm not sure. If you said arm-elf in the mail Subject > > you might get the attention of somebody who knows the details. > > so just repost with a changed subject?
I've just noticed this thread is on the main gcc@ mailing list, I assumed it was on the gcc-help@ list where questions like this belong. ARM maintainers will probably see it anyway. I've CC'd one of the ARM maintainers now too. Richard, can you answer the question from the first mail in the thread, regarding arm multilibs? (This is for gcc 3.4.0!) Can the original multilib list be replicated by copying the items from -print-multi-lib into the --with-multilib-list configure option? > > > > > Have you tried to obtain the sources from whoever provided the original > > compiler that you're trying to replicate? > > > > so far not available - the original providing company (Microcross) is > long defunct (over a decade now) > but im still trying to reach someone > >
