On Tue, 16 Dec 2025, 23:05 soma pal via Gcc, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello ,
>
> I am a research scholar and a beginner to GCC, studying the impact of
> optimization flags across different GCC optimization levels. As part of
> this work, I am trying to understand whether it is possible to achieve
> performance equivalent to O0 level  by disabling optimization flags that
> are mentioned for higher optimizations.
>

No, it is not.


> Specifically, I achieved performance very close to -O2 starting from -O3,
> and similarly from -O2 to -O1, by cumulatively disabling the optimization
> flags that differ between these levels. However, I am unable to achieve
> performance equivalent (or even close) to -O0 when transitioning from -O1,
> despite disabling all visible optimization flags (using -fno-* flags, and
> -fdisabling tree/RTL dumps).
>

This is expected, and well known, and documented:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FAQ#optimization-options


> In practice, even after disabling all -O1 optimizations, the performance
> remains significantly better than -O0—roughly halfway between -O0 and -O1.
> This suggests that -O1 or -O enables certain behaviors or properties that
> are not exposed through individual optimization flags and also that differ
> from O0.
>

Correct.


> I would greatly appreciate any guidance on the following:
>
>
>    - Are there optimization-related behaviors at -O1 that are controlled
>    implicitly (e.g., via internal optimize > 0 gating or other non-flag
>    mechanisms)?
>

Yes

   - Is it expected that -O0 behavior cannot be fully reproduced by
>    disabling flags starting from -O1?
>

Yes

   - Are there additional factors that significantly differentiate -O1 from
>    -O0,


Yes

and can I redirect those properties while transitioning from O1 to O0?
>

No


   - Can I implement any flag that will redirect to O0 properties even if I
>    run O1 with all defined disable flags?
>

No


>
>   Any pointers to documentation, design rationale, or relevant source
> locations would be extremely helpful.
>
> Thank you very much for your time and guidance.
>
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Soma Pal
>

Reply via email to