Arnaud Charlet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The main issue is really with svn status and the handling of versions and > branches which seems to be quite different and quite disruptive for cvs > users.
Branches is where we expect the most from SVN, compared to CVS. The wiki part about management of branches is a little confusing, indeed. I'll try to reword it to make it easier. There is also a little tool (svnmerge) which helps managing branches. If you care elaborating on which your typical cvs procedures for branch management are (I'd separate release branches from dev branches for clarity), I can work out for you the correct SVN counterparts, which - I'm sure - they're going to be more than satisfying. -- Giovanni Bajo
