On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 at 13:09, Frank Scheiner wrote: > On 08.01.26 14:06, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 at 12:43, Frank Scheiner wrote: > >> But if you tell me that this won't affect the GCC bootstraps, I could > >> enable that for future builds, of course. Also to possibly solve the > >> below issues because of missing LTO support. > >> > >> So, just to be sure: `--enable-lto` is enough to support this, or do I > >> also need "lto" in `--enable-languages=`? > > > > Just remove --disable-lto > > > > It's enabled automatically, which adds it to --enable-languages > > automatically, but the explicit --disable-lto overrides that default > > behaviour. > Ok, great, will do so. I was irritated because Slackware explicitly > puts "lto" in `--enable-languages=` for their GCC builds, so I didn't > know what effect that has or not.
It's equivalent to using --enable-lto (which is redundant).
