Hi Richard On Fri, 24 Apr 2026 12:40:36 +0200 Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 12:34 PM Giacomo Tesio <[email protected]> > wrote: > > for the record and future reference, can you please disclose what's > > the first version of GCC including such LLM-generated code? > > As a project we should refuse to answer this kind of questions since > we honestly cannot know to full extent. to be fair, I didn't ask to the project, but to Albert, the author of the patches and he can know to full extent. Albert already stated he will mark LLM-generated future contributions > From now on, I will add Assisted-by: to the patches. which btw is a pretty common requirement these days, both in opensource and in proprietary projects. > We can say that all patches are either of irrelevant (to copyright) > size, have clear copyright by virtue of FSF assignment, or were > contributed under the DCO. Sure, but transparently disclosing LLM-contributions would not contraddict such statements / assignments. After all, Albert himself agrees that he should have disclosed such info before contributing his patches, so what's the problem to do it retroactively? Giacomo
