gcc  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: gcc-16-20251214 testsuite results for ia64 Frank Scheiner via Gcc
  • Re: gcc-16-20251214 testsuite results for ia64 Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: gcc-16-20251214 testsuite results for ia64 Frank Scheiner via Gcc
  • Re: gcc-16-20251214 testsuite results for ia64 Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: gcc-16-20251214 testsuite results for ia64 Frank Scheiner via Gcc
  • Re: gcc-16-20251214 testsuite results for ia64 Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: gcc-16-20251214 testsuite results for ia64 Frank Scheiner via Gcc
• gcc-16-20251214 native bootstrap on ia64 Frank Scheiner via Gcc
  • Re: gcc-16-20251214 native bootstrap on ia64 Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: gcc-16-20251214 native bootstrap on ia64 Frank Scheiner via Gcc
• Andrew Pinski appointed Global Reviewer Jeffrey Law via Gcc
  • Re: Andrew Pinski appointed Global Reviewer Patrick Horgan via Gcc
  • Re: Andrew Pinski appointed Global Reviewer Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Andrew Pinski appointed Global Reviewer Arsen Arsenović
• LTO bootstraps fail (on aarch64, but I'm not sure that matters: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2026-January/866676.html Toon Moene
  • Re: LTO bootstraps fail (on aarch64, but I'm not sure that matters: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2026-January/866676.html Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• gcc-16-20260104 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• git clone or fetch via https stuck? Jiang, Haochen via Gcc
  • Re: git clone or fetch via https stuck? Ben Boeckel via Gcc
  • Re: git clone or fetch via https stuck? Mark Wielaard
  • Re: git clone or fetch via https stuck? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • RE: git clone or fetch via https stuck? Jiang, Haochen via Gcc
  • Re: git clone or fetch via https stuck? Mark Wielaard
  • Re: git clone or fetch via https stuck? Joseph Myers via Gcc
• Question about insn dependency updates Richard Braun
• gcc-15-20260103 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-14-20260102 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-13-20260101 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• GNU toolchain 2025 in year review GNU Tools weekly via Gcc
• Re: [PING][PATCH] binutils-gdb/git: Handle *.ac and *.m4 files in .gitattributes Maciej W. Rozycki
• No distinction between COMPLEX and CMPLX in gfortran Naveen Yadav via Gcc
  • Re: No distinction between COMPLEX and CMPLX in gfortran Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: No distinction between COMPLEX and CMPLX in gfortran Paul Richard Thomas via Gcc
  • Re: No distinction between COMPLEX and CMPLX in gfortran Naveen Yadav via Gcc
• [PATCH] c6x: fix the scheduling of floating-point multiplication instructions Richard Braun
  • Re: [PATCH] c6x: fix the scheduling of floating-point multiplication instructions Jeffrey Law via Gcc
• SSL disconnection while pulling latest changes of the gcc repo Tom Kacvinsky via Gcc
  • Re: SSL disconnection while pulling latest changes of the gcc repo Mark Wielaard
  • Re: SSL disconnection while pulling latest changes of the gcc repo Tom Kacvinsky via Gcc
  • Re: SSL disconnection while pulling latest changes of the gcc repo Tom Kacvinsky via Gcc
  • Re: SSL disconnection while pulling latest changes of the gcc repo Mark Wielaard
  • Re: SSL disconnection while pulling latest changes of the gcc repo Tom Kacvinsky via Gcc
  • Re: SSL disconnection while pulling latest changes of the gcc repo Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: SSL disconnection while pulling latest changes of the gcc repo Tom Kacvinsky via Gcc
• gcc-16-20251228 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• [on aarch64] Problems with compiling support libraries like libiberty with master using lto recently. Toon Moene
• gcc-15-20251227 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-14-20251226 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-13-20251225 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• [PATCH] libgcc: Use UTItype with mode(TI) for 16-byte atomics Xin Wang via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH] libgcc: Use UTItype with mode(TI) for 16-byte atomics Andreas Schwab
  • Re: [PATCH] libgcc: Use UTItype with mode(TI) for 16-byte atomics Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• Generation of Make Dependencies for C++ Modules joergboe via Gcc
  • Re: Generation of Make Dependencies for C++ Modules Ben Boeckel via Gcc
  • Re: Generation of Make Dependencies for C++ Modules joergboe via Gcc
  • Re: Generation of Make Dependencies for C++ Modules Ben Boeckel via Gcc
  • Re: Generation of Make Dependencies for C++ Modules vspefs via Gcc
  • Re: Generation of Make Dependencies for C++ Modules Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc
  • Re: Generation of Make Dependencies for C++ Modules Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: Generation of Make Dependencies for C++ Modules vspefs via Gcc
  • Re: Generation of Make Dependencies for C++ Modules Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc
  • Re: Generation of Make Dependencies for C++ Modules Nathaniel Shead via Gcc
  • Re: Generation of Make Dependencies for C++ Modules vspefs via Gcc
  • Re: Generation of Make Dependencies for C++ Modules Ben Boeckel via Gcc
  • Re: Generation of Make Dependencies for C++ Modules vspefs via Gcc
  • Re: Generation of Make Dependencies for C++ Modules Ben Boeckel via Gcc
  • Re: Generation of Make Dependencies for C++ Modules vspefs via Gcc
  • Re: Generation of Make Dependencies for C++ Modules Ben Boeckel via Gcc
  • Re: Generation of Make Dependencies for C++ Modules Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
  • Re: Generation of Make Dependencies for C++ Modules Ben Boeckel via Gcc
• More Forge, More Actions, More Infrastructure Mark Wielaard
• gcc-16-20251221 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Plugin adding a new warning for C: detection of suspicious variable assignment in struct initialization GRASSET Judicaël via Gcc
• gcc-15-20251220 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-14-20251219 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Location of container files for CI purposes Claudio Bantaloukas via Gcc
  • Re: Location of container files for CI purposes Christophe Lyon via Gcc
  • Re: Location of container files for CI purposes Richard Earnshaw via Gcc
• gcc-13-20251218 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Reminder - GNU Toolchain Office Hours Asia timezone 18 December 9 a.m. India time. Ramana Radhakrishnan via Gcc
• Achieving O0 performance by disabling O1 level optimizations soma pal via Gcc
  • Re: Achieving O0 performance by disabling O1 level optimizations Eric Botcazou
  • Re: Achieving O0 performance by disabling O1 level optimizations Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Achieving O0 performance by disabling O1 level optimizations soma pal via Gcc
  • Re: Achieving O0 performance by disabling O1 level optimizations Thomas Koenig via Gcc
• Does -flto effect vectorization and unrolling of loops? Steve Kargl via Gcc
  • Re: Does -flto effect vectorization and unrolling of loops? Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: Does -flto effect vectorization and unrolling of loops? Steve Kargl via Gcc
  • Re: Does -flto effect vectorization and unrolling of loops? Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Does -flto effect vectorization and unrolling of loops? Steve Kargl via Gcc
  • Re: Does -flto effect vectorization and unrolling of loops? Steve Kargl via Gcc
  • Re: Does -flto effect vectorization and unrolling of loops? Richard Biener via Gcc
• Why are there uncommitted changes to update_web_docs_git on the server? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Why are there uncommitted changes to update_web_docs_git on the server? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Why are there uncommitted changes to update_web_docs_git on the server? Gerald Pfeifer
  • Re: Why are there uncommitted changes to update_web_docs_git on the server? Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• Regarding current state of graphite in GCC Avinash Jayakar
  • Re: Regarding current state of graphite in GCC Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Regarding current state of graphite in GCC Avinash Jayakar
• Use of LLM for patches Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Use of LLM for patches Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Use of LLM for patches Eric Botcazou
  • Re: Use of LLM for patches Mark Wielaard
• gcc-16-20251214 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• controlled compile-time specialization Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: controlled compile-time specialization Andreas Schwab
  • Re: controlled compile-time specialization Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: controlled compile-time specialization Andreas Schwab
  • Re: controlled compile-time specialization Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: controlled compile-time specialization Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: controlled compile-time specialization Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: controlled compile-time specialization Martin Jambor
  • Re: controlled compile-time specialization Martin Uecker via Gcc
• gcc-15-20251213 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-14-20251212 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• M pm Charnese Thompson via Gcc
• Sourceware Open Office Now Mark Wielaard
• gcc-13-20251211 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Requiring a BZ account as part of commit access process Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: Requiring a BZ account as part of commit access process Mark Wielaard
  • Re: Requiring a BZ account as part of commit access process Jason Merrill via Gcc
  • Re: Requiring a BZ account as part of commit access process Mark Wielaard
  • Re: Requiring a BZ account as part of commit access process Jason Merrill via Gcc
  • Re: Requiring a BZ account as part of commit access process Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: Requiring a BZ account as part of commit access process Andreas Schwab via Gcc
  • Re: Requiring a BZ account as part of commit access process Mark Wielaard
  • Re: Requiring a BZ account as part of commit access process Jason Merrill via Gcc
• Inquiry about current status of GCC v850 backend for RH850-U2A/U2B (embedded) Jose Martins
  • Re: Inquiry about current status of GCC v850 backend for RH850-U2A/U2B (embedded) Jeff Law via Gcc
• failed to compile gcc-15.2.0 in Ubuntu 24 Mario Jaime Martín Burgos via Gcc
  • Re: failed to compile gcc-15.2.0 in Ubuntu 24 Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• Monthly GNU Toolchain office hours Asia Timezone. Ramana Radhakrishnan via Gcc
• pointer comparison in GIMPLE Krister Walfridsson via Gcc
  • Re: pointer comparison in GIMPLE Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: pointer comparison in GIMPLE Krister Walfridsson via Gcc
  • Re: pointer comparison in GIMPLE Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: pointer comparison in GIMPLE Krister Walfridsson via Gcc
  • Re: pointer comparison in GIMPLE Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: pointer comparison in GIMPLE Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: pointer comparison in GIMPLE Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: pointer comparison in GIMPLE Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: pointer comparison in GIMPLE Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: pointer comparison in GIMPLE Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: pointer comparison in GIMPLE Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: pointer comparison in GIMPLE Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: pointer comparison in GIMPLE Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: pointer comparison in GIMPLE Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: pointer comparison in GIMPLE Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: pointer comparison in GIMPLE Krister Walfridsson via Gcc
  • Re: pointer comparison in GIMPLE Jason Merrill via Gcc
  • Re: pointer comparison in GIMPLE Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: pointer comparison in GIMPLE Jason Merrill via Gcc
  • Re: pointer comparison in GIMPLE Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: pointer comparison in GIMPLE Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: pointer comparison in GIMPLE Martin Uecker via Gcc
  • Re: pointer comparison in GIMPLE Krister Walfridsson via Gcc
  • Re: pointer comparison in GIMPLE Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc
• Deprecating IA64 and selective scheduling Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Deprecating IA64 and selective scheduling Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: Deprecating IA64 and selective scheduling Frank Scheiner via Gcc
  • Re: Deprecating IA64 and selective scheduling Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Deprecating IA64 and selective scheduling Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Deprecating IA64 and selective scheduling Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: Deprecating IA64 and selective scheduling Tomáš Glozar via Gcc
  • Re: Deprecating IA64 and selective scheduling Tomáš Glozar via Gcc
  • Re: Deprecating IA64 and selective scheduling Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: Deprecating IA64 and selective scheduling Tomáš Glozar via Gcc
  • Re: Deprecating IA64 and selective scheduling Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Deprecating IA64 and selective scheduling Frank Scheiner via Gcc
  • Re: Deprecating IA64 and selective scheduling Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
  • Re: Deprecating IA64 and selective scheduling Frank Scheiner via Gcc
  • Re: Deprecating IA64 and selective scheduling Tomáš Glozar via Gcc
• RFC: RISC-V: Add new -mtune syntax Kito Cheng via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: RISC-V: Add new -mtune syntax Sam James via Gcc
  • Re: RFC: RISC-V: Add new -mtune syntax Vineet Gupta via Gcc
• gcc-16-20251207 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• C++: injected class name vs. constructor reference Andrey Tarasevich via Gcc
  • Re: C++: injected class name vs. constructor reference Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: C++: injected class name vs. constructor reference LIU Hao via Gcc
  • Re: C++: injected class name vs. constructor reference Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• Optimizing volatile loads without -ffuse-ops-with-volatile-access? Georg-Johann Lay via Gcc
• gcc-15-20251206 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Return type qualifiers and function type compatibility (missing diagnostic in GCC) Andrey Tarasevich via Gcc
  • Re: Return type qualifiers and function type compatibility (missing diagnostic in GCC) LIU Hao via Gcc
  • Re: Return type qualifiers and function type compatibility (missing diagnostic in GCC) Andrey Tarasevich via Gcc
• gcc-14-20251205 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-13-20251204 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Inquiry About Google Summer of Code 2026 Ali Shouman via Gcc
  • Re: Inquiry About Google Summer of Code 2026 Teapot via Gcc
  • Re: Inquiry About Google Summer of Code 2026 Martin Jambor
• Bug in identical code folding? Georg-Johann Lay via Gcc
  • Re: Bug in identical code folding? Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Bug in identical code folding? LIU Hao via Gcc
  • Re: Bug in identical code folding? Georg-Johann Lay via Gcc
  • Re: Bug in identical code folding? Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Bug in identical code folding? Georg-Johann Lay via Gcc
• Question about ifcvt optimization ywgrit via Gcc
• gcc-16-20251130 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-15-20251129 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• There Gail Sutton via Gcc

• Earlier messages
• Later messages