Basile STARYNKEVITCH <[email protected]> writes: > Hello all, > > related to https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2026-August/248648.html > >> >> # Developers that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps: >> # (1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this >> License >> # giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it. >> >> so copyrighting the software is a means to an end, not an end in >> itself. >> >> What happens if a patch contains a non-trival amount of code that >> cannot be copyrighted because it was assisted by AI? >> >> If some third party were to distribute a binary of gcc, they would >> still be obliged to distribute the source that is covered by the >> GPLv3. > > > I tend to agree (long time ago I was involved in GCC: > https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.0779 ...) at that time using AI inspired > techniques. > > > I also don't understand what is AI assisted code generation, because > that requires a (computable) definition of AI.
We deliberately used the term "LLM", "LLM-generated", and so on, NOT "AI assisted" or anything of that sort. > > Are software projects like refpersys.org (source code below) considered > as "AI"? Please re-read the policy. > [...] sam
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
