On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 9:31 AM Jonathan Yong <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 8/30/26 17:31, Zhongteng Gui wrote: > > On 2026/08/31 01:16, Jonathan Yong wrote: > >> On 8/30/26 15:33, Zhongteng Gui wrote: > >>> On 2026/08/19 16:15, Richard Biener wrote: > >>>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 5:31 PM LIU Hao <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> 在 2026-8-17 16:54, Richard Biener via Gcc 写道: > >>>>>> Maintainers of the respective ports should propose such changes, then > >>>>>> they can > >>>>>> easily be accepted. > >>>>> > >>>>> There was a discussion back in March, but no further action was taken: > >>>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2026-March/247820.html > >>>> > >>>> I'd like to see separate proposals for each individual change, proposed > >>>> in patch form to gcc-17/criteria.html, ideally from respective target/OS > >>>> maintainers, but at least acked by them. > >>>> > >>>> The web pages are in git as well, git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc-wwwdocs.git > >>>> > >>>> Sorry if that wasn't clear. Approval would be from release managers. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Richard. > >>>> > >>>>> (By the way, GCC 17 is missing from https://gcc.gnu.org/releases.html.) > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Best regards, > >>>>> LIU Hao > >>> > >>> Cc Jonathan Yong. Seemes like you're the only maintainer of Cygwin and > >>> MinGW-w64. > >> > >> I already replied and agreed to drop 32-bit cygwin for 64-bit cygwin and > >> changing i686-mingw32 to i686-w64-mingw32 and adding x86_64-w64-mingw32. > >> > >> Am I missing something? > >> > > > > Sorry, I didn't notice that LH already sent 2 patches to gcc-patches list > > and > > you've replied. But looks like the 2 patches haven't been commited? > > Richard, are maintainers supposed to push to gcc-wwwdocs?
Yes, approved patches can be pushed by anybody with access. Richard. >
