Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tuesday 22 November 2005 18:42, David Edelsohn wrote: | | > I will work with the GCC SC and FSF on that issue once the licensing | > issue is addressed and we know LLVM is a viable option. | > | What purpose would that serve? I'm not concerned about the SC, initially. | It's the development community at large that needs convincing first.
help me finish converting GCC to something compilable with a C++ compiler. Without having something concrete to test with, we'll go again over abstract arguments -- I did the conversion (many times) on my machine as a proof-of-concept. Lots of things kept (and are keeping) me busy. But, I'm back now and working on it. I'd not mind more hands/help. -- Gaby
