Jan Hubicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/19/2006 07:51:42 PM: > > > > Hi, > > thepatch limiting minimal probability to 2% seems to make sense to me, > > so please submit it for review. It would be nice to have the code to > > compute maximal number of exits from loop too, but if it is really 9, we > > would end up with 1% (it might however make difference elsewhere). > > If you would feed motivated to do so, please just do ;) Otheriwse I will > > add it to my ever growing TODO list. > > Hi, > this patch at least hides the ugly details within some abstraction so we > can eventally go for propagating reliability information across CFG if > we conclude it is important. How does it work for you? >
I like your approach, thanks. I've confirmed that the generated code no longer contains the mis-predicted branch hints. Will follow up with results from SPEC run once I get them (hosed things up for myself, so restarting from scratch) :-( -Pat
