From: Mark Shinwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > My port, based on (GCC) 4.2.0 20061002 (experimental), is producing > > incorrect code for the following test case: > [snip] > > I've only had a very quick look at your code, but I have a feeling > thatthis is an instance of the kind of slip-up with > GO_IF_MODE_DEPENDENT_ADDRESSthat my patch at > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00858.html is > aimed at preventing. (This patch is currently only applied to > addrmodesbranch.) > > Mark
Hhmm. Is the intent of your patch simply to prevent the mistake of backends not defining GO_IF_MODE_DEPENDENT_ADDRESS properly? My backend checks for POST_INC and POST_DEC in GO_IF_MODE_DEPENDENT_ADDRESS. Charles J. Tabony
