> The report in > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-12/msg00459.html > > claims to be from the 4_2_branch at > > Mon Dec 11 08:40:27 UTC 2006 (revision 119731) > > That's wrong; it's actually from > > Sun Dec 10 08:39:43 UTC 2006 (revision 119704) > > but the run took more than 24 hours and the cron job re-synced. And > that's without building Java.
Thanks for letting us know. > The test wasn't using -j, and it's only a 400 MHz Sparc. Seems I need > to fix that. Running the tests twice (for 32 and 64 bits) seems to take > ages. Right, this seems to be noticeably slower with 4.2, especially libstdc++. -- Eric Botcazou
