On 20 December 2006 00:39, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: > On 20/12/06, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Heh. Or you could always make it a divide-by-zero error instead :) > > Oh, sorry. I didn't get this. If you would be so kind to elaborate... Possibly the world's only attempt ever at C pointer-arithmetic humour, and now we know why. Ordered comparison of pointers amounts to pointer subtraction which is done in units of the size of the pointed-to type and the sizeof void is zero[*]. cheers, DaveK [*] - Or conceivably NaN. -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today....