On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Andrew Pinski wrote: > No I am not saying that. I am saying that those patches might not be > worth commenting on. If you feel they are worth commenting on, then > comment on them but I don't see you commenting on those patches at > all. I have not seen any patches that require 4-5 pings, plus people > have off weeks/months so somethings it might not look any one cares > when in reality they do but they have not gotten to those patches yet.
Also: I think some patches have all relevant maintainers thinking "someone else would be a better maintainer to review this patch [but I might or might not review it if still being pinged in a month]" or "this patch should be reviewed by someone able to review it as a whole rather than my reviewing only the parts I can approve" or the opposite "this patch should be reviewed by a set of relevant maintainers rather than using GWP". You don't want gcc-patches clogged up with people making these indications that someone else should review the patch but it might be of use to have an off-list way of tracking such indications. -- Joseph S. Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
