On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Mike Stump wrote: > I did some quick C measurements compiling expr.o from the top of the > tree, with an -O0 built compiler with checking: > [...] > I'll accept a 0.15% compiler.
Hi Mike, When I brought up the 16-bit option earlier, Jakub replied that x86 would get hosed worse because it's 16-bit accesses are not as efficient as it's 8 or 32 bit ones. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-03/msg00763.html I assume you tested on Darwin? Can you tell me if it was ppc or x86? Thanks, --Kaveh -- Kaveh R. Ghazi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
