Andrew Pinski writes: > On 4/8/07, Bradley Lucier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is this just a rumor, or are there data that backs this up. (That - > > fwrapv doesn't work, not that Dewar was always told that it doesn't > > work.) > > If you look into the bugzilla, you will see now two bugs filed against > -ftrapv. One because the rtl back-end removes the libcall and another > because we optimize away the overflow checks in libgcc2.c (PR 19020 > and PR 31477). I don't know why people can't look this up themselves, > it is not like it is private information or anything.
You're really good at Bugzilla searches -- I find it really hard to locate anything in Bugzilla, but I've seen you can do so in an instant. So, I know it's possible, but... :-) Andrew. -- Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903
