Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But this was never a documented, supported way of doing things; > nothing that involves hand-editing could be.
Fair enough, as far as my particular case is concerned. But something new in 4.2 is inserting "-Xcompiler" between "-Xlinker" and the following argument. It may be that this insertion can be triggered in other ways that don't involve hand-editing, which would make it definitely a bug. So this is not known to be a bug, but also not known to not be a bug. > Maybe there could be something like --with-libc=/some/path that > would automatically generate the correct Makefiles; that would be an > enhancement. Yes, although a more general enhancement would be to let the user add arbitrary flags to LDFLAGS_FOR_TARGET. paul