Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > My personal preference would be to acknowledge that for our users > there is no significant difference between GPLv2 and GPLv3. And we > should acknowledge that people backporting patches from later releases > are already going to have to relicense to GPLv3. Therefore, we should > simply change gcc 4.2.2 to be GPLv3. This is a lot of churn on the > branch, and I wish it were unnecessary, but presumably the FSF > requires it. I think that choice is the lesser evil.
Strongly agreed! Personally, I think that bumping version number is the worst possible solution of all proposed.
