> Yes, the gimplifier often makes several passes over the same trees to get > them completely lowered. cp_gimplify_expr is a subroutine of the > gimplifier.
Good, I just wanted to make sure I wasn't off my rocker or anything. > Sure. Another alternative would be to leave the calls to gimplify_stmt (or > probably change them to gimplify_to_stmt_list) and return GS_ALL_DONE from > cp_gimplify_expr. Yes, in a few places it definitely seems better to completely gimplify the given statement and return GS_ALL_DONE. Will do so when it's easier. Heads up. Thanks. Aldy
