On 10/24/07, Jack Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a reason it's not just an error, then? (As a user) I don't > see the point of something being a warning when the compiled code is > intentionally set up to crash.
Because the C++ standard (and the C standard) has mentioned that you cannot diagnostic an undefined runtime behavior. So the code is valid semantically but undefined at runtime. Thanks, Andrew Pinski
