On 10/24/07, Sebastian Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/24/07, Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We are also thinking about lowering GIMPLE a bit further and delay > > the transition into RTL. > > Diego, can you be more specific about what parts you think have to be > lowered more from GIMPLE?
TLS accesses for PIC mode is one example of where it would be nice to rerun some CSE type for the function call (this would be able to get rid of libcalls at this point). Real address selection at the tree level, maybe a scheduler too. -- Pinski
