On 10/25/07, Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have to admit I am also surprised about the use of "deprecated" in > the context of removing these headers. My previous understanding was > that we'd announce deprecation (and issue warnings) for at least one > major release before actually removing the feature in a following one.
Well technically these headers have been deprecated since at least 3.2 (maybe even back in 3.0) with them producing a warning. So I don't know if we should move them or not but we have followed our own rules here. Thanks, Andrew Pinski
