On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 19:41 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 26/10/2007, skaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This would not be correct. When you deprecate C++2000 features, > > you should retain them in such a way that a compiler switch > > such as --std=C++2000 will ensure they're visible in the usual way. > > So this doesn't go unchallenged and give people reading the archives > the wrong idea: that's exactly what Benjamin proposed. I agree, I read that subsequently and the detailed deprecation plan seems very good to me.. this is a case where access to the 'archive variable' from two 'threads' was 'unordered' .. :) -- John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net> Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net