Hi,

Please reply to the list also and not only to me .

On Nov 13, 2007 2:38 PM, 马骅 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The target platform is arm, gcc version is 4.0.3,
> binutils-2.17.50.0.8, uClibc-0.9.28.

You might need to use a newer version of the compiler. The current
release series supported by the community are only 4.1.2 and 4.2.2.
Please provide all the information required for someone to reproduce
the bug and file a bug on bugzilla if you see this in a more recent
version of the compiler and you can't find a duplicate of this bug in
bugzilla (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla )

Please provide all the information as specified here .

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html#detailed

Thanks
Ramana



> The host platform is cygwin (1.5.24).
> I build the toolchains use buildroot.
> Thanks.
>
>
> On Nov 13, 2007 5:02 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > On Nov 13, 2007 2:29 PM, 马骅 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > hi , when I try to compile the busybox 1.1.3 using buildroot in cygwin.
> > >   an internal compiler error happens.
> > >   Could any one give a help on this?
> > >
> > >   LINK busybox_unstripped
> > > /home/mahua/opt/armbuild26_v0 /build_arm/busybox-
> > > 1.1.3/networking/telnetd.c: In function 'telnetd_main':
> > > /home/mahua/opt/armbuild26_v0
> > > /build_arm/busybox-1.1.3/networking/telnetd.c:541: warning: pointer
> > > targets in passing argument 3 of 'accept' differ in signedness
> > > /home/mahua/opt/armbuild26_v0/build_arm/busybox-1.1.3/editors/vi.c: In
> > > function 'do_cmd':
> > > /home/mahua/opt/armbuild26_v0/build_arm/busybox-1.1.3/editors/vi.c:2989:
> > > internal compiler error: in set_iv, at tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c :830
> > > Please submit a full bug report,
> > >
> > > I post it on busybox mailist, someone advice me to ask here.
> >
> > You have not mentioned the target platform , the version and other
> > information so that people can help understand where the problem is .
> >
> > Please read http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html about how to report a bug.
> >
> > cheers
> > Ramana
> >
> >
> >
> > > Thanks very much.
> > > huamama
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ramana Radhakrishnan
> >
>



-- 
Ramana Radhakrishnan

Reply via email to