2007/11/26, Robert Dewar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > J.C. Pizarro wrote: > > > You've reason, the world "full" can mean one of many scenarios depending > > in how wants it to "be filled"! > > > > So, it's afraid unknownly in what scenario has to be filled. > > > > But, the most important thing is the idea of separation to two choices > > of debugging, not only the correctness 100% of its implementation. > > > > In the context of this topic, the phrase "full debugged information" means > > all thing that needs the "step to step" debugger as line by line, > > frame by frame, expression by expression, etc not overenginnering it. > > > > Too, it means that it doesn't lack any thing needed by the "step to step" > > debugger. > > > > Its "fullness" depends in what "step to step" debugger we go to use it? > > > > Sincerely, J.C.Pizarro > > I tried hard to understand the above, but I am afraid it got so garbled > in the english that it is impossible to understand what you are saying :-(
Paradoxing the "fullness": --------------------------------- To you, "I want a full drink of water". And you say me, "what? a glass? a bottle? a jug? a barrel? a deposit? a reservoir?" J.C.Pizarro (sorry, i'm a bad english speaker)
