> In the Ada revision histories, we have always given the what-and-the-why > (and if necessary the why-not), and they have proved very helpful, I > always found the RH's for gigi (done in the gcc style, much less helpful > because they omitted the why).
Sorry, that's simply not true, the ChangeLog and the commit messages in the ada/ subdirectory are on par with the rest of the GCC tree, and that's fine. -- Eric Botcazou
