On Dec 5, 2007 6:15 PM, Ben Elliston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 09:18 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote: > > > First, continuing to have good quality messages. Right now at the > > very least you get a (semi-) accurate record of what was touched. > > I've seen plenty of ChangeLog-less projects out there than end up with > > commits like "fixed a bug", or even worse. > > Something else that hasn't been raised is that ChangeLogs can be > revised. We often see people making mistakes with their ChangeLog > entries, but since the ChangeLog is versioned, they can revise it. If > you screw up a commit message, it's much harder to fix it (and a purist > might argue that to do so would be destroying revision history). Uh?
svn propedit --revision <rev number> svn:log Hope this helps!
