Jon Smirl wrote:
Switching to the Google perftools malloc
http://goog-perftools.sourceforge.net/
Google allocator knocked 600MB off from memory use.
Memory consumption did not fall during the write out phase like it did with gcc.
Since all of this is with the same code except for changing the
threading split, those runs where memory consumption went to 4.5GB
with the gcc allocator must have triggered an extreme problem with
fragmentation.
Total CPU time 196 CPU minutes vs 190 for gcc. Google's claims of
being faster are not true.
Did you use the tcmalloc with heap checker/profiler, or tcmalloc_minimal?
--
Andreas Ericsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OP5 AB www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231
