Andrew Pinski writes: > Can we stop talking about x86/x86_64 specifics issues here?
No. >I have an use case for the PowerPC side of the Cell BE for variables >greater than the normal stack boundary alignment of 16bytes. They need >to be 128byte aligned for DMA transfering to the SPUs. > >I already proposed a patch [1] to fix this use case but I have not >seen many replies yet. Complaining about someone talking about x86/x86_64 specific issues and then bringing up a PowerPC/Cell specific issue is probably not the best way to go about getting your patch approved. Ross Ridge