On Feb 18, 2008 6:18 PM, Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > As I've mentioned last week, I've created branches/gcc-4_3-branch. > The trunk is now 4.4 stage 1, the branch is open for regression bugfixes > and documentation fixes only, but additionally all checkings require > RM approval in addition to normal approval. > Before the release candidate is cut, it would be good to fix the 4 P1 > bugs we have now: > PR34950 - Jason/Mark, could you help with this? It is 4.2/4.3 > regression, so perhaps doesn't need to hold the rc > PR35218 - I believe the latest patch worked for the tester, > so we now have a patch and just need an approval? > PR35232 - I'm not sure I'm comfortable with a big reload patch > this late > PR35239 - Rask, do you have a patch for this? > and: > libjava bootstrap problem on i?86-darwin8* - can anyone who can reproduce > it please try > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg00265.html > ? Can we have a bugzilla bug for it? > ppc-linux -maltivec stuff - assuming a solution is agreed on quickly > > Anything else I'm forgetting?
I'd love to get the fix for c++/35022 into this release. It's a regression marked as an ice-on-invalid, but slight variations on that test show several issues with variadic templates. The patch is here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-02/msg00575.html The fix itself will only affect code when we're in C++0x mode, so it's very low-risk. With this fix, nearly all of the non-error-recovery issues with variadic templates will have been solved, so we'll have a pretty solid start at C++0x out there for people to start working with. - Doug
