2008/3/10, Jim Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Fran Baena wrote: > > RTL represents a low-level language, machine-independent. But I didn't > > find any especification of such language represented. This is, I found > > no document where the language represented were described or defined > > in a grammar way. > > > RTL isn't a programming language, and hence has no grammar. It is > merely one of the internal representations that gcc uses for optimizing > and generating code. We do have gcc internals documentation that you > have already been pointed at.
i agree with you, RTL is not a programming language, is a language that is represented internally. But it could match a grammar definition. And this is my question, what is the process to define a RTL. Thank you Fran
