Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Richard Sandiford wrote: >> But as I said to HJ, I'm happy to apply the DF patch in isolation, >> as long as we accept that the benefit of fixing a correctness >> regression outweighs the potential performance regression. >> > Sure, regression is more important. Therefore even if you submit only > one (reverse BB traverse) patch, it is ok for me. > > As I wrote I am going to look at the second patch. I have feeling that > even without the second patch, there will be no performance regression. > I think that my latest patches (some of them are not in the mainline > yet) removed IRA instability toward allocno ordering. I just need time > to make sure about this.
Great! Thanks. I'll test overnight and submit tomorrow if everything goes OK. Richard